Homogenizing nationalists, budding fascists, and truculent exceptionalists: the end of world order in the Indo-Pacific

2Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Building on Ernest Gellner’s theory of the nation-state and drawing on insights from John Lukacs and George Kennan, this article contends that the major powers of the contemporary Indo-Pacific are characterized by conflicting nationalisms. Homogenizing nationalism seeks to form China—a former multiethnic empire—into a unitary nation-state. Budding fascism endeavors to transform India—founded as a secular state—into a Hindu nation in which there is little place for the ‘other.’ And in the USA, truculent exceptionalism readily acknowledges that coexistence with China is no longer possible in the long run. All three powers have an alternative that they might embrace: toleration. But civility, in both domestic and international politics, is increasingly rare. The future of world order in the Indo-Pacific does not look bright.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McKinney, J. M. (2022). Homogenizing nationalists, budding fascists, and truculent exceptionalists: the end of world order in the Indo-Pacific. International Politics, 59(2), 280–301. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00303-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free