ARBITRARIEDAD Y MOTIVACIÓN EN LAS COLOCACIONES

  • PENADÉS MARTÍNEZ I
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article we examine the concept of arbitrariness and motivation in the area of collocations. The authors who characterise these units as having the property of arbitrariness do not offer a definition of the term, and generally link it to linguistic usage, which determines the limits in the choice of a collocative by the base. Neither is the concept of motivation defined on applying it to collocations, although this concept is currently preferred for their characterisation, in preference to arbitrariness. From this standpoint, collocations are considered to be motivated because a collocative is not an individual choice made by a base; on the contrary, bases form semantic classes and show certain features, usually semantic ones, which are shared with the collocative. Without wishing to deny this fact, this article starts from Saussure's concept of arbitrariness and a definition of motivation linked to European structuralism. The conclusion is that all idioms are relatively arbitrary, that is to say, partially motivated, and that they present both morphological and semantic motivation. This theoretical vision of collocations has implications that are applied in the field of lexicography and in language teaching and learning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

PENADÉS MARTÍNEZ, I. (2017). ARBITRARIEDAD Y MOTIVACIÓN EN LAS COLOCACIONES. RLA. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 55(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-48832017000200121

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free