Breadth of knowledge vs. grades: What best predicts achievement in the first year of health sciences programmes?

  • Shulruf B
  • Li M
  • McKimm J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study aimed to identify those features within secondary school curricula and assessment, particularly science subjects that best predict academic achievement in the first year of three different three-year undergraduate health professional programmes (nursing, pharmacy, and health sciences) at a large New Zealand university. In particular, this study compared the contribution of breadth of knowledge (number of credits acquired) versus grade level (grade point average) and explored the impact of demographic variables on achievement. The findings indicated that grades are the most important factor predicting student success in the first year of university. Although taking biology and physics at secondary school has some impact on university first year achievement, the effect is relatively minor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shulruf, B., Li, M., McKimm, J., & Smith, M. (2012). Breadth of knowledge vs. grades: What best predicts achievement in the first year of health sciences programmes? Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 9, 7. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2012.9.7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free