Abstract
In this paper we present a case of a structured, facilitated group process with a climate action group engaged in a local Transition initiative. We explore how the interacting contexts between action researchers and the group acted as a constraint for the trajectory of the group process, by looking at the mismatches between the group’s and the researchers’ purposes and differences in expectations about methods of engagement. A methodological framework was used for evaluating the outcomes. The primary aim of this article was to investigate and point out dynamics that may be a hindrance to the effectiveness of a facilitated local climate initiative, with the view to inform facilitation practices and improve future action research processes.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Andersson, P., Ringnér, H., & Inglis, J. (2018). Constructive Scaffolding or a Procrustean Bed? Exploring the Influence of a Facilitated, Structured Group Process in a Climate Action Group. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 31(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9428-5
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.