The Crucial Role of Social Welfare Criteria and Individual Heterogeneity for Optimal Inheritance Taxation

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper extends the calibrations of Piketty and Saez (2013. "A Theory of Optimal Inheritance Taxation." Econometrica 81 (5): 1851-86) to unveil the importance of the assumed social welfare criteria and its interplay with individual heterogeneity on optimal inheritance taxation. I calibrate the full social optimal tax rate and find that it is highly sensitive to the assumed social welfare criteria. The optimal tax rate ranges from negative (under a utilitarian criterion) to positive and large (even assuming joy of giving motives). A decreasing marginal utility of consumption does not affect the results qualitatively, given the underlying distribution of wealth and income. I also calibrate the optimal tax rate by percentile of the distribution of bequest received, as in Piketty and Saez, but accounting for heterogeneity in wealth and labor income. This leads to significant variation in the optimal tax rate among zero-bequest receivers, contrary to their finding of a constant tax rate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

García-Miralles, E. (2020). The Crucial Role of Social Welfare Criteria and Individual Heterogeneity for Optimal Inheritance Taxation. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2019-0274

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free