Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with ribociclib + fulvestrant: Results from MONALEESA-3

  • Fasching P
  • Esteva F
  • Pivot X
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In the MONALEESA-3 trial (NCT02422615), ribociclib +fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo+ fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC who had received no or only 1 line of prior endocrine therapy for ABC. Here, we present PROs from the trial, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive ribociclib (600 mg/day, 3-weekson/ 1-week-off) + fulvestrant (500 mg on Day 1 of every cycle and Cycle 1 Day 15; n=484) or placebo +fulvestrant (n=242). Time to definitive 10% deterioration from baseline (TTD) in HRQoL (global health status/quality of life scale score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire [GHS/QLS]) and pain (BPI-SF questionnaire) were compared between treatment arms using a stratified log-rank test; a stratified Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CI). PROs were also assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Results: Questionnaire compliance rates were high (>90% at baseline for each measure). Mean GHS/QLS was maintained or improved during every cycle of treatment in both arms (mean change from baseline up to Cycle 19 [n≥50 in both arms]: ribociclib +fulvestrant 3.6-4.9; placebo +fulvestrant 1.3-4.3). At the end of treatment, addition of ribociclib to fulvestrant had not negatively impacted GHS/QLS (mean change from baseline: -5.2 points in the ribociclib arm [n=184] vs -5.5 points in the placebo arm [n=113]). Median TTD in GHS/QLS was not reached (NR) in the ribociclib arm (95% CI 22.1-NR) vs 19.4 months in the placebo arm (95% CI 16.6-NR); hazard ratio: 0.80 (95% CI 0.60-1.05). Using the BPI-SF scale, median TTD was 25.4 months in the ribociclib arm vs NR in the placebo arm for worst pain (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% CI 0.58-1.13), 25.4 months vs NR for pain severity index (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% CI 0.60- 1.11), and NR vs NR for pain interference index (hazard ratio: 0.87, 95% CI 0.63-1.21). Conclusions: As well as significantly prolonging PFS compared with placebo+ fulvestrant, adding ribociclib to fulvestrant maintains quality of life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fasching, P. A., Esteva, F. J., Pivot, X., Nusch, A., Beck, J. T., Chan, A., … Neven, P. (2018). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with ribociclib + fulvestrant: Results from MONALEESA-3. Annals of Oncology, 29, viii90. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy272.282

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free