Three Arterial Grafts Improve Late Survival

  • Gaudino M
  • Puskas J
  • Di Franco A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background:Little evidence shows whether a third arterial graft provides superior outcomes compared with the use of 2 arterial grafts in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. A meta-analysis of all the propensity score-matched observational studies comparing the long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of 2-arterial versus 3-arterial grafts was performed. Methods:A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify relevant articles. Long-term mortality in the propensity score-matched populations was the primary end point. Secondary end points were in-hospital/30-day mortality for the propensity score-matched populations and long-term mortality for the unmatched populations. In the matched population, time-to-event outcome for long-term mortality was extracted as hazard ratios, along with their variance. Statistical pooling of survival (time-to-event) was performed according to a random effect model, computing risk estimates with ...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gaudino, M., Puskas, J. D., Di Franco, A., Ohmes, L. B., Iannaccone, M., Barbero, U., … Taggart, D. P. (2017). Three Arterial Grafts Improve Late Survival. Circulation, 135(11), 1036–1044. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.116.025453

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free