Inter-rater reliability and factor analysis of the Brazilian version of the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight - Expanded Version (SAI-E)

8Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: The Schedule for the Assessment of Insight - Expanded Version consists of 11 items that encompass: awareness of having a mental illness, ability to rename psychotic phenomena as abnormal, and compliance with treatment. The objective of the study was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability and to study the factorial structure of the Brazilian version of the instrument. Method: The Brazilian version of the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight - Expanded Version was used for the assessment of insight of 109 psychotic inpatients, 60 of whom had the interview tape-recorded in order to be scored by an independent evaluator. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was adopted as the inter-rater reliability coefficient. In the factor analysis, principal components analysis and Varimax rotation were adopted. Results: Inter-rater reliability coefficients from good to excellent were found for the individual items of the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight - Expanded Version with ICC values ranging from 0.54 to 0.82. Regarding the total score, inter-rater reliability was excellent, with ICC = 0.90. A factorial structure similar to the one obtained by the original version of the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight - Expanded Version was found, with 3 factors accounting for 71.72% of variance. Conclusion: In the Brazilian context, the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight - Expanded Version presented good inter-rater reliability and factorial structure compatible to the insight dimensions that are intended to be evaluated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dantas, C. D. R., & Banzato, C. E. M. (2007). Inter-rater reliability and factor analysis of the Brazilian version of the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight - Expanded Version (SAI-E). Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 29(4), 359–362. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-44462006005000041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free