In-furrow inoculation of soybean as alternative to fungicide and micronutrient seed treatment

21Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Soybean is a major grain crop in Brazil, and yields can be considerably improved by inoculation with selected Bradyrhizobium strains. However, the incompatibility between inoculation and seed treatments with fungicides and micronutrients represents a major barrier to the achievement of high rates of biological N2 fixation. Inoculation practices that can alleviate the negative effects of agrochemicals must therefore be found and in-furrow inoculation seems to be an attractive alternative. This study reports the results of seven field experiments conducted in three growing seasons in Brazil; three in soils previously cropped with inoculated soybean (> 104 cells g-1 of soil of Bradyrhizobium), and four in areas where the crop was sown for the first time (< 102 cells g-1 of soil of Bradyrhizobium). The compatibility with fungicides and micronutrients was compared in seeds inoculated with peat or liquid inoculants, or treated with different doses of liquid inoculant in-furrow. In areas with established Bradyrhizobium populations, seed-applied agrochemicals did generally not affect nodulation, but also did not increase yields, while inoculation always increased N grain accumulation or yield, and N fertilizer decreased both nodulation and yield. Where soybean was sown for the first time, the seed treatment with agrochemicals affected nodulation when applied together with peat or liquid inoculant. In-furrow inoculation alleviated the effects of seed treatment with agrochemicals; the best performance was achieved with high Bradyrhizobium cell concentrations, with up to 2.5 million cells seed-1.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Campo, R. J., Araujo, R. S., Mostasso, F. L., & Hungria, M. (2010). In-furrow inoculation of soybean as alternative to fungicide and micronutrient seed treatment. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Do Solo, 34(4), 1103–1112. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-06832010000400010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free