Cooperating Teachers' Perceptions Of Important Elements Of The Student Teaching Experience: A Focus Group Approach With Quantitative Follow-Up

  • Edwards M
  • Briers G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two purposes of this study were to describe selected characteristics of cooperating teachers/ schools and to identify teachers' perceptions about important elements of student teaching. Some researchers contend that to better understand complex phenomena, a "soft systems" approach (e.g., focus groups) may be more appropriate than quantitative methodologies. So, another purpose was to compare teachers' perceptions when determined by focus groups and by a mail questionnaire. Five teacher focus groups provided the perceptions (35 teachers; 23 schools); each group represented a "core" area of student teaching. Thirty-four elements were identified as being "important." Then, via a mail questionnaire, teachers rated the elements using a Likert-type rating scale ("5" = "High Importance,"..."1" = "No Importance"); return rate was 89% for teachers. Cronbach's reliability estimates for importance ratings of the "core areas" ranged from .49 to .86; overall reliability was .91. Items were perceived to have "much" or "high importance" (overall M = 4.54). "A well rounded program emphasizing instruction, SAEs, and youth leadership activities" received the highest rating (M = 5.00). Teachers' ratings by mail questionnaire confirmed their earlier perceptions, thus supporting the assertion that a "soft systems" approach can be useful when examining a complex phenomenon.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Edwards, M. C., & Briers, G. E. (2001). Cooperating Teachers’ Perceptions Of Important Elements Of The Student Teaching Experience: A Focus Group Approach With Quantitative Follow-Up. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(3), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.03030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free