Abstract
Background: The role of tonsillectomy in the management of adult tonsillitis remains uncertain and UK regional variation in tonsillectomy rates persists. Patients, doctors and health policy makers wish to know the costs and benefits of tonsillectomy against conservative management and whether therapy can be better targeted to maximise benefits and minimise risks of surgery, hence maximising cost-effective use of resources. NATTINA incorporates the first attempt to map current NHS referral criteria against other metrics of tonsil disease severity. Methods/design: A UK multi-centre, randomised, controlled trial for adults with recurrent tonsillitis to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of tonsillectomy versus conservative management. Discussion: NATTINA is designed to evaluate the relative effectiveness and efficiency of tonsillectomy versus conservative management in patients with recurrent sore throat who are eligible for surgery. Most adult tonsil disease and surgery has an impact on economically active age groups, with individual and societal costs through loss of earnings and productivity. Avoidance of unnecessary operations and prioritisation of those individuals likely to gain most from tonsillectomy would reduce costs to the NHS and society.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rubie, I., Haighton, C., O’Hara, J., Rousseau, N., Steen, N., Stocken, D. D., … Wilson, J. (2015). The NAtional randomised controlled Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA): A clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised control trial. Trials, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0768-0
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.