Study Item Parameters of Classical and Modern Theory of Differential Aptitude Test: Is it Comparable?

4Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to find the Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Modern Test Theory (MTT) item parameters of the Differential Aptitude Test (DAT) and examined their comparability of them. The item parameters being studied are difficulty level and discrimination index. 5.024 data of the result sub-test DAT were documented by the Department of Psychology and Guidance and Counselling bureau. The parameter of classical and modern test items was estimated and correlated by examining the comparability between parameters. The results show that there is a significant correlation between item parameter estimates. The Rasch and IRT 1-PL models have the highest correlation toward CTT regarding the item difficulty level. In contrast, model 2-PL has the highest correlation toward CTT in the item discrimination index. Overall, the study concluded that CTT and MTT were comparable in estimating item parameters of DAT and thus could be used independently or complementary in developing DAT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Setiawati, F. A., Amelia, R. N., Sumintono, B., & Purwanta, E. (2023). Study Item Parameters of Classical and Modern Theory of Differential Aptitude Test: Is it Comparable? European Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 1097–1107. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.1097

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free