Abstract
Objectives. To compare the effectiveness of a steroid injection (25 mg/ml prednisolone acetate) with a local anaesthetic control in the treatment of heel pain and to determine any advantage for patients' comfort of using a posterior tibial nerve block to anaesthetize the heel prior to infiltration. Methods. A double-blind randomized controlled trial using a 2 x 2 design in a hospital-based rheumatology clinic. Subjects comprised 106 patients with heel pain referred by general practitioners and other rheumatologists working in Camden and Islington Health Authority. Main outcome measures: heel pain reduction at 1, 3 and 6 months, and patient comfort at the time of injection. All outcomes were measured using a 10 cm visual analogue scale. Results. A statistically significant reduction in pain was detected at 1 month (P = 0.02) in favour of steroid injection, but thereafter no differences could be detected. Patient comfort was not significantly affected by anaesthesia of the heel (P = 0.5). Conclusions. A steroid injection can provide relief from heel pain in the short term. There appears to be no increase in patient comfort from anaesthetizing the heel prior to infiltration.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Crawford, F., Atkins, D., Young, P., & Edwards, J. (1999). Steroid injection for heel pain: Evidence of short-term effectiveness. A randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology, 38(10), 974–977. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/38.10.974
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.