Medication refractory restless legs syndrome: Real-world experience

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), impacting 5–13% of the population, poses challenges in long-term management. A knowledge gap exists in predicting resistance to first-line therapies. Objective: To identify demographic and clinical factors predictive of refractory cases. Methods: This retrospective study, conducted at the Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (January 2018 to September 2023) identified all patients with RLS evaluated during the pre-specified period and compared clinical and demographic data between medication-refractory (“malignant”) group and “benign” cohort. Results: Among 132 patients with RLS, 23 (17.4%) were categorized as medication-refractory. This cohort was characterized by a significantly lower mean age at onset (39.3 vs. 53.5 years, p = 0.0005), longer disease duration (26.7 vs. 14.0 years), and a higher prevalence of a positive family history of RLS among first-degree relatives compared to the “benign” group (56.5% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.003). Furthermore, compared to the “benign” group, in the refractory group dopamine agonists were initiated as the primary medication at a significantly higher rate (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Our study found that a younger age at disease onset, prolonged disease duration, initial use of dopamine agonists, and a positive family history increased the likelihood of refractory RLS. We caution against the use of dopamine agonists, especially in young patients with RLS. Additionally, botulinum toxin might be considered a viable second-line treatment, especially for patients with otherwise medically-refractory RLS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petramfar, P., & Jankovic, J. (2024). Medication refractory restless legs syndrome: Real-world experience. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2024.123121

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free