Good risk measures, bad statistical assumptions, ugly risk forecasts

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper proposes the time-heterogeneous Student's t autoregressive model as an alternative to the various volatility forecast models documented in the literature. The empirical results indicate that: (i) the proposed model has better forecasting performance than other commonly used models, and (ii) the problem of reliable risk measurement arises primarily from the model risk associated with risk forecast models rather than the particular risk measure for computing risk. Based on the results, the paper makes recommendations to regulators and practitioners.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Michaelides, M., & Poudyal, N. (2024). Good risk measures, bad statistical assumptions, ugly risk forecasts. Financial Review, 59(2), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12368

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free