In the absence of animacy: Superordinate category structure affects subordinate label verification

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Theoretical accounts as well as behavioral studies reporting animacy effects offer inconsistent and sometimes contradictory results. A possible explanation for these inconsistencies may be inadvertent biases in the stimuli selected for test - with category-specific effects driven by characteristics of test stimuli other than animacy per se. In this study, we pit animacy against feature structure (intra-item variability), in a picture-word matching task. For unimpaired adults, regardless of whether objects were from animate (mammals; insects) or inanimate (clothes; musical instruments) superordinate categories, participants were faster to match basic level labels with objects from categories with low intra-item variability (mammals; clothes) than from categories with high intra-item variability (insects; instruments). Thus, pitting animacy against variability allowed us to clarify that observable differences in processing speed between animals and instruments are systematically driven by the intra-item variability of the superordinate categories, and not by animacy itself. © 2013 Ilic et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ilic, O., Kovic, V., & Styles, S. J. (2013). In the absence of animacy: Superordinate category structure affects subordinate label verification. PLoS ONE, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083282

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free