Evaluation of two automated capillary electrophoresis systems for human serum protein analysis

28Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: We compared automated capillary electrophoresis (CE) systems Capillarys 2® from Sebia and V8® from Helena Biosciences Europe (Elitech) with the semi-automated Hydrasys-Hyrys® agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) from Sebia. Design and methods: We evaluated analytical performances and compared 129 fresh routine sera (group A) to 164 frozen pathologic samples with suspicion or antecedent of monoclonal component (MC) (group B). Immunofixation was then compared with immunotyping provided by both CE systems. Results: Analytical performances from both CE systems have proven suitable results for clinical use, with within-run and between-run coefficients of variation inferior or equal to 5.2% and 7.7%, respectively. A good correlation was found between AGE and CE with r-value ranging from 0.81 to 0.96 for both CE systems. We observed high MC detection sensitivities (> 85%) of in electrophoretogram readings for both CE systems. MC identification using CE systems provided suitable concordance with immunofixation, although failing to detect some IgM proteins or free light chains. Conclusions: Both Capillarys 2® and V8® are reliable automated CE systems for patient care. © 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chartier, C., Boularan, A. M., Dupuy, A. M., Badiou, S., Bargnoux, A. S., Cognot, C., … Cristol, J. P. (2011). Evaluation of two automated capillary electrophoresis systems for human serum protein analysis. Clinical Biochemistry, 44(17–18), 1473–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.05.022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free