Study Objectives: To compare the efficacy of a mandibular advancement splint (MAS) and a novel tongue stabilizing device (TSD) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Design: A randomized crossover design was used. Patients: Twenty-seven patients (20 male, 7 female), recruited from a tertiary hospital sleep clinic. Measurements and Results: The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was reduced with MAS (11.68 ± 8.94, P = 0.000) and TSD (13.15 ± 10.77, P = 0.002) compared with baseline (26.96 ± 17.17). The arousal index decreased for MAS (21.09 ± 9.27, P = 0.004) and TSD (21.9 ± 10.56, P = 0.001) compared with baseline (33.23 ± 16.41). Sixty-eight percent of patients achieved a complete or partial response with MAS, compared with 45% with TSD. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was decreased with MAS (P = <0.001) and TSD (P = 0.002). Subjective improvements in snoring and quality of sleep were reported, with a better response for MAS than TSD. Compliance was poorer for TSD, and the side effect profiles of the 2 modalities were different. All patients were satisfied with MAS compared to TSD, and 91% of patients preferred the MAS. Conclusion: Objective testing showed the MAS and TSD had similar efficacy in terms of AHI reduction. Patients reported improvements with both devices; however, better compliance and a clear preference for MAS was apparent when both devices were offered. Longer term studies are needed to clarify the role of TSD.
CITATION STYLE
Deane, S. A., Cistulli, P. A., Ng, A. T., Zeng, B., Petocz, P., & Darendeliler, M. A. (2009). Comparison of mandibular advancement splint and tongue stabilizing device in obstructive sleep apnea: A randomized controlled trial. Sleep, 32(5), 648–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/32.5.648
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.