Acceptance-versus change-based pain management: The role of psychological acceptance

17Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study compared two theoretically opposed strategies for acute pain management: an acceptance-based and a change-based approach. These two strategies were compared in a within-subjects design using the cold pressor test as an acute pain induction method. Participants completed a baseline pain tolerance assessment followed by one of the two interventions and another pain tolerance test. The alternate strategy was presented in a separate, but otherwise identical, experimental session. On average, both interventions significantly increased pain tolerance relative to baseline, with no significant difference between the two intervention conditions. Baseline psychological acceptance emerged as a significant moderator of intervention efficacy; individuals with a high level of acceptance benefited significantly more from the acceptance intervention, whereas those with a low level of acceptance benefited more from the change-based intervention. Implications for increasing the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic treatments based on individual differences are discussed. © SAGE Publications 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blacker, K. J., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., & Kounios, J. (2012). Acceptance-versus change-based pain management: The role of psychological acceptance. Behavior Modification, 36(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445511420281

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free