Against 'Saving Lives': Equal Concern and Differential Impact

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Bioethicists often present 'saving lives' as a goal distinct from, and competing with, that of extending lives by as much as possible. I argue that this usage of the term is misleading, and provides unwarranted rhetorical support for neglecting the magnitudes of the harms and benefits at stake in medical allocation decisions, often to the detriment of the young. Equal concern for all persons requires weighting equal interests equally, but not all individuals have an equal interest in 'life-saving' treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chappell, R. Y. (2016). Against “Saving Lives”: Equal Concern and Differential Impact. Bioethics, 30(3), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12171

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free