Electric and magnetic fields: Do they need Lorentz covariance?

7Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Electric and magnetic fields are relative. They depend not only on a choice of electromagnetic sources via Maxwell equations, but also on a choice of observer, a choice of material reference-system. In 1908 Minkowski defined electric and magnetic fields on a four-dimensional spacetime, as tensorial concomitants of observer. Minkowski defined Lorentz-group-covariance of concomitant tensor field as group-action that commute with contractions. Present-day textbooks interpret Lorentz-group-covariance of concomitant tensor differently than Minkowski in 1908. In 2003-2005 Tomislav Ivezíc re-invented Minkowski's group-covariance. Different interpretations of group-covariance, lead to different relativity transformations of electric and magnetic fields. An objective of present article is to explore third possibility, implicit in [Minkowski 1908, 11.6], where a set of all relativity transformations of all material observers forms a groupoid category, which is not a group. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oziewicz, Z. (2011). Electric and magnetic fields: Do they need Lorentz covariance? In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 330). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/330/1/012012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free