Patient safety culture in critical and non-critical areas: a comparative study

4Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: to compare the perception of patient safety culture among health workers from critical and non-critical areas. Method: cross-sectional study with health workers from critical and non-critical areas of a large hospital. Data collection used a characterization instrument and the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. The analysis was performed in the Predictive Analytics Software Statistic®. Results: a total of 393 workers participated, predominantly women, over 43 years old, nursing technicians, with a partner, and children. Results indicated that the areas have a negative perception of patient safety (66.5%, ±12.7 critical; 63.5%, ±14.4 non-critical). Only job satisfaction had a positive score (83.0%, ±15.9 critical; 80.1%, ±17.5 non-critical). There was a relationship between being a worker in critical areas and having a positive perception of the unit’s management (p = 0.041). Conclusion: both areas have a negative perception of the safety culture. Although critical areas have obtained more positive evaluations, the results did not show statistical significance when compared to non-critical areas.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carneiro, A. S., de Lima Dalmolin, G., de Souza Magnago, T. S. B., Moreira, L. P., Costa, E. D., & Andolhe, R. (2021). Patient safety culture in critical and non-critical areas: a comparative study. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem, 55, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0141

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free