Biomarkers of aging in real life: three questions on aging and the comprehensive geriatric assessment

44Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Measuring intrinsic, biological age is a central question in medicine, which scientists have been trying to answer for decades. Age manifests itself differently in different individuals, and chronological age often does not reflect such heterogeneity of health and function. We discuss here the value of measuring age and aging using the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), cornerstone of geriatric medicine, and operationalized assessment tools for prognosis. Specifically, we review the benefits of employing the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI), which collects information about eight domains relevant for the global assessment of the older person (functional and cognitive status, nutrition, mobility and risk of pressure sores, multi-morbidity, polypharmacy, and co-habitation), in the evaluation of the functional status, and in the prediction of health outcomes for older adults. Further integration of biological markers of aging into multidimensional prognostic tools is warranted, as well as actions which could facilitate prognostic assessments for older persons in all healthcare settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zampino, M., Polidori, M. C., Ferrucci, L., O’Neill, D., Pilotto, A., Gogol, M., & Rubenstein, L. (2022, December 1). Biomarkers of aging in real life: three questions on aging and the comprehensive geriatric assessment. GeroScience. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-022-00613-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free