Recipient and Center Factors Associated with Immunosuppression Practice beyond the First Year after Liver Transplantation and Impact on Outcomes

12Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background. Immunosuppression is a critical aspect of post-transplant management, yet practices at intermediate and late time points after liver transplantation (LT) are poorly characterized. Methods. A retrospective cohort of 11 326 adult first LT alone recipients between 2007 and 2016 was identified by linking United Network for Organ Sharing transplant data to Medicare administrative claims. The immunosuppression regimen was obtained from Medicare billing claims. Factors associated with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) monotherapy at 1-, 3-, and 5-y post-LT were investigated using mixed-effects logistic regression. Center practice heterogeneity was evaluated. The association of immunosuppression regimen (time-updating) with patient and graft survival was studied. Results. CNI monotherapy was used in 51.9% at 1-y post-LT and 68.6% at 5-y post-LT. Center-specific rates ranged from 20.0%-79.9% to 15.4%-95.2%, respectively. CNI monotherapy at 1-and 3-y post-LT was less likely among Black recipients (P=0.027 and P=0.015 versus White, respectively). CNI plus antimetabolite was associated with improved adjusted patient (hazard ratio, 0.59; P < 0.001) and graft (hazard ratio, 0.62; P < 0.001) survival versus CNI monotherapy. The benefit of CNI plus antimetabolite on patient and graft survival increased with older age. Conclusions. In this first longitudinal analysis of LT immunosuppression practices among Medicare beneficiaries, a CNI plus antimetabolite approach led to improved outcomes. Significant center heterogeneity in practice was observed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bittermann, T., Lewis, J. D., & Goldberg, D. S. (2022). Recipient and Center Factors Associated with Immunosuppression Practice beyond the First Year after Liver Transplantation and Impact on Outcomes. Transplantation, 106(11), 2182–2192. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000004209

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free