A new prediction model for giant cell arteritis in patients with new onset headache and/or visual loss

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The gold standard for diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a temporal artery biopsy (TAB). We sought for a clinical useful model to predict when an invasive TAB is not necessary to confirm GCA. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted with patients > 50 years with possible GCA, presenting with newly onset headache and/or visual loss. Demographical, clinical, laboratory findings and histological data were collected. Results: Fifty-six (70%) of the 94 patients showed 1 or more halos of the superficial temporal artery branches. Ultrasound-guided biopsy was positive in 28 patients (30%). Four independent variables predicted a positive TAB: weight loss, bilateral headache, positive halo sign and thrombocytosis. The ROC of the model had an area under the curve of 0.932 with a PPV of 83% and a NPV of 94%. Conclusions: Weight loss, bilateral headache, a positive halo sign with duplex and thrombocytosis are the most important clinical and laboratory predictors for GCA in a selected group of patients. Significance: In patients > 50 years presenting with new onset headache or visual loss with 3 or more of the above mentioned risk factors, a biopsy of the temporal artery is not needed to confirm the diagnosis GCA.KEY MESSAGES In our study biopsy of the temporal artery was positive in 30% of the patients with possible GCA Weight loss, bilateral headache, a positive halo sign on duplex and thrombocytosis are predictors for GCA The halo sign had a high sensitivity but a low specificity for a biopsy proven GCA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moudrous, W., Visser, L. H., Yilmaz, T., H. Wieringa, M., Alleman, T., Rovers, J., … J. F. Brekelmans, G. (2022). A new prediction model for giant cell arteritis in patients with new onset headache and/or visual loss. Annals of Medicine, 54(1), 2770–2776. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2130971

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free