Comparative study of the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis with or without external fixation for severe elbow stiffness

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach open arthrolysis with and without hinged external fixation. Methods: We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical data of patients with severe elbow stiffness who were treated in our institution from January 2018 to January 2019. All of them were treated with combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis. There were 20 patients who had the hinged external fixation placed and 29 patients without the placement of the external fixation. Their baseline characteristics and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared. Results: The average follow-up time was 28.4 ± 3.7 months. There were no significant differences in the ROM of the elbow, MEPS, VAS, DASH, or complications between the two groups. The operation time and treatment cost of the patients without external fixation were significantly lower than patients with external fixation. Conclusion: Combined medial-lateral approach open elbow arthrolysis without external fixation is a safe and effective way to treat elbow stiffness. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xiao, D., Gong, M., Chen, C., Zha, Y., Li, T., Ji, S., … Jiang, X. (2021). Comparative study of the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis with or without external fixation for severe elbow stiffness. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04796-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free