Systematic Evaluation of Predictive Fairness

9Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Mitigating bias in training on biased datasets is an important open problem. Several techniques have been proposed, however the typical evaluation regime is very limited, considering very narrow data conditions. For instance, the effect of target class imbalance and stereotyping is under-studied. To address this gap, we examine the performance of various debiasing methods across multiple tasks, spanning binary classification (Twitter sentiment), multi-class classification (profession prediction), and regression (valence prediction). Through extensive experimentation, we find that data conditions have a strong influence on relative model performance, and that general conclusions cannot be drawn about method efficacy when evaluating only on standard datasets, as is current practice in fairness research. Our code is available at: https://github.com/HanXudong/Systematic_ Evaluation_of_Predictive_Fairness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Han, X., Shen, A., Cohn, T., Baldwin, T., & Frermann, L. (2022). Systematic Evaluation of Predictive Fairness. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 12th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing: Long Paper, AACL-IJCNLP 2022 (Vol. 1, pp. 68–81). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.aacl-main.6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free