Collaboration matters: A randomized controlled trial of patient-clinician collaboration in suicide risk assessment and intervention

10Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Clinician collaboration can help high-risk individuals to manage their suicidal crises. However, limited research has directly examined how higher patient-clinician collaboration during assessment and intervention can effectively reduce suicidal ideation. This novel randomized clinical trial compared a high vs. low level of patient-clinician collaboration by pairing commonly used assessment (Structured Interview vs. Narrative Assessment) and intervention approaches (Safety Planning Intervention vs. Crisis Response Planning). We hypothesized that the interventions involving higher (than lower) patient-clinician collaboration during assessment (Narrative Assessment) or intervention (Crisis Response Planning) would lead to larger reductions in suicidal ideation. Methods: Eighty-two participants with a history of suicide ideation and/or attempts were randomly assigned to one of the four interventions varying in patient-clinician collaboration. After attrition, sixty-six participants completed the study. Suicidal ideation via ecological momentary assessment was measured 14 days before and 14 days after treatment. Results: Although the severity of suicidal ideation decreased in all groups, the two groups that included highly collaborative assessment had larger pre-post reductions in suicidal ideation (Narrative Assessment+Safety Plan; dwithin = 0.26, and Narrative Assessment+Crisis Response Plan; dwithin = 0.19) than the groups that included a checklist-based assessment (Structured Interview). Limitations: Longer follow-up periods with a larger sample would have provided an understanding of the durability of intervention effects. Conclusion: Results suggest that the inclusion of higher patient-clinician collaboration techniques during suicide risk assessment can effectively reduce suicidal thoughts. Thus, clinician-led collaborative risk assessment approaches can enhance the effects of safety planning-type interventions among patients with elevated risk for suicide versus checklist-based assessment approaches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lohani, M., Bryan, C. J., Elsey, J. S., Dutton, S., Findley, S. P., Langenecker, S. A., … Baker, J. C. (2024). Collaboration matters: A randomized controlled trial of patient-clinician collaboration in suicide risk assessment and intervention. Journal of Affective Disorders, 360, 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free