Quantified Kinematics to Evaluate Patient Chemotherapy Risks in Clinic

  • Hasnain Z
  • Nilanon T
  • Li M
  • et al.
5Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

© 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved. PURPOSE Performance status (PS) is a key factor in oncologic decision making, but conventional scales used to measure PS vary among observers. Consumer-grade biometric sensors have previously been identified as objective alternatives to the assessment of PS. Here, we investigate how one such biometric sensor can be used during a clinic visit to identify patients who are at risk for complications, particularly unexpected hospitalizations that may delay treatment or result in low physical activity. We aim to provide a novel and objective means of predicting tolerability to chemotherapy. METHODS Thirty-eight patients across three centers in the United States who were diagnosed with a solid tumor with plans for treatment with two cycles of highly emetogenic chemotherapy were included in this single-arm, observational prospective study. A noninvasive motion-capture system quantified patient movement from chair to table and during the get-up-and-walk test. Activity levels were recorded using a wearable sensor over a 2-month period. Changes in kinematics from two motion-capture data points pre- and post-treatment were tested for correlation with unexpected hospitalizations and physical activity levels as measured by a wearable activity sensor. RESULTS Among 38 patients (mean age, 48.3 years; 53% female), kinematic features from chair to table were the best predictors for unexpected health care encounters (area under the curve, 0.775 6 0.029) and physical activity (area under the curve, 0.830 6 0.080). Chair-to-table acceleration of the nonpivoting knee (t = 3.39; P = .002) was most correlated with unexpected health care encounters. Get-up-and-walk kinematics were most correlated with physical activity, particularly the right knee acceleration (t = −2.95; P = .006) and left arm angular velocity (t = −2.4; P = .025). CONCLUSION Chair-to-table kinematics are good predictors of unexpected hospitalizations, whereas the get-up- and-walk kinematics are good predictors of low physical activity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hasnain, Z., Nilanon, T., Li, M., Mejia, A., Kolatkar, A., Nocera, L., … Nieva, J. (2020). Quantified Kinematics to Evaluate Patient Chemotherapy Risks in Clinic. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics, (4), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1200/cci.20.00010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free