Developing and validating a frailty score based on patient-reported outcome 3 months after stroke: A Riksstroke-based study

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Frailty is common after stroke and linked to poor outcomes, but many measures are clinician-rated, time-consuming, and not suited to patient-reported data. To address these issues, we developed and validated a frailty score from the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke) three-month follow-up questionnaire. Methods: We analyzed responses from 19,470 stroke survivors to nine patient-reported items covering function, mood, fatigue, pain and general health, in the 2021–2022 Riksstroke questionnaire. Dimensionality was assessed with Mokken Scale Analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Item response theory (IRT) was used for score computation. Competing graded response IRT models (unidimensional, correlated-factor, bifactor) were compared, and measurement fairness was examined using differential item functioning (DIF) across age, sex, and education. Prognostic validity was tested with Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression for all-cause mortality. Results: From the Mokken Scale Analysis, all items met scalability criteria. Factor analysis suggested two correlated interpretable facets (Physical Functioning; Well-being/Mental Health). A bifactor IRT model provided the best fit to the data, comprising a general frailty dimension while addressing the strong correlation between the facets. DIF was minimal for sex and education, with modest age-related effects. Higher frailty scores were associated with increased mortality in adjusted Cox models and Kaplan–Meier curves. Tools for computing frailty scores are available at https://github.com/joakimwallmark/frailty-irt-scores. Conclusions: A robust, fair, and prognostically meaningful frailty score can be derived from patient-reported items in Riksstroke. More broadly, the study demonstrates how routinely collected patient-reported outcome measures can be leveraged to build scalable frailty scores, offering efficient cost-effective tools for monitoring outcome and guiding quality improvement in stroke care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wallmark, J., Wiberg, M., & Eriksson, M. (2026). Developing and validating a frailty score based on patient-reported outcome 3 months after stroke: A Riksstroke-based study. PLOS ONE, 21(2 February). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343249

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free