Different durations of cognitive stimulation therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

25Citations
Citations of this article
117Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) of different durations for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Methods: A comprehensive search was carried out in three databases. The primary outcome was Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score. We conducted a meta-analysis with Review Manager, version 5.3 and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration Recommendations assessment tool. Results: Treatment effects from the meta-analysis showed that CST plus acetylcholinester-ase inhibitors (ChEIs) was better than the control assessed by MMSE. In addition, the meta-analysis indicated that long-term CST was better than short-term or maintenance CST. Conclusion: Our study confirmed that the combination of CST and drug treatment for AD is effective in AD, regardless of whether short-term CST, maintenance CST, or long-term CST is used. The long-term CST appears to be more effective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, J., Duan, Y., Li, H., Lu, L., Liu, J., & Tang, C. (2019). Different durations of cognitive stimulation therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Interventions in Aging. Dove Medical Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S210062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free