Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy, hysteroscopy e hysterosalpingography in evaluation of female infertility

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the hysterosalpingography (HSG) in relation on the laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in female infertility. Five hundred patient with age varying from 22 to 40 years under investigation in infertility, underwent the evaluation for hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. This study compared the results obtained in the three evaluation types. In the cases of tubeuterine alterations there were 20% of false negative results and 3% of false positive for HSG, verifying a sensibility and the specificity 80% and 97% respectively. In the endouterine alterations there were false negative results in 23% and false positive in 2% for HSG, with a sensibility and specificity of 77% and 98% respectively. HSG showed low sensibility and we conclude that the negative results need complementary exams.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Almodin, C. G., Lima, E. R., & Storti, S. (2000). Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy, hysteroscopy e hysterosalpingography in evaluation of female infertility. Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida, 4(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.2000.4.1.05

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free