Voluntary regulations and innovation: The Case of ISO 14001

107Citations
Citations of this article
132Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Governments enact environmental regulations to compel firms to internalize pollution externalities. Critics contend that regulations encourage technological lock-ins and stifle innovation. Challenging this view, the Porter-Linde hypothesis suggests that appropriately designed regulations can spur innovation because (1) pollution reflects resource waste; (2) regulations focus firms' attention on waste; and (3) with regulation-induced focus, firms are incentivized to innovate to reduce waste. This article explores the regulation-innovation linkage in the context of voluntary regulations. The authors focus on ISO 14001, the most widely adopted voluntary environmental program in the world. Examining a panel of 79 countries for the period 1996-2009, they find that country-level ISO 14001 participation is a significant predictor of a country's environmental patent applications, a standard proxy for innovation activity. The policy implication is that public managers should consider voluntary regulation's second-order effects on innovation, beyond their first-order effects on pollution and regulatory compliance. © 2014 by The American Society for Public Administration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lim, S., & Prakash, A. (2014). Voluntary regulations and innovation: The Case of ISO 14001. Public Administration Review, 74(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12189

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free