Manipulation of total knee replacements

  • Esler C
  • Lock K
  • Harper W
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As part of a prospective study of 476 total knee replacements (TKR), we evaluated the use of manipulation under anaesthesia in 47 knees. Manipulation was considered when intensive physiotherapy failed to increase flexion to more than 80°. The mean time from arthroplasty to manipulation was 11.3 weeks (median 9, range 2 to 41). The mean active flexion before manipulation was 62° (35 to 80). One year later the mean gain was 33° (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, range −5 to 70, 95% CI 28.5 to 38.5). Definite sustained gains in flexion were achieved even when manipulation was performed four or more months after arthroplasty (paired t-test, p < 0.01, CI 8.4 to 31.4).A further 21 patients who met our criteria for manipulation declined the procedure. Despite continued physiotherapy, there was no significant increase in flexion in their knees. Six weeks to one year after TKR, the mean change was 3.1° (paired t-test, p = 0.23, CI −8.1 to +2).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Esler, C. N. A., Lock, K., Harper, W. M., & Gregg, P. J. (1999). Manipulation of total knee replacements. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 81-B(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.81b1.0810027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free