How Must a Polygon Be According to Hard of Hearing Students? An Investigation with a Semiotic Approach

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study explores how hard of hearing students decided whether the shape was a polygon and which semiotic sources were used when the students engaged in explaining geometrical concepts. It was defined how the students interacted with geometric shapes using semiotic sources and examined how such multimodal interactions with geometric figures displayed their reasoning. The study was a case study and carried out three hard of hearing students. The data was collected through interviews and analyzed with content analysis. It was detected that the students paid attention to edge, angle, and vertex of the shapes in the process of identifying polygon. It was seen that the students used gesture, speech, sign language, inscriptions which are semiotic sources and personal or mathematical definitions to express polygon concept. However, it has been determined that students have some misconceptions in the process of explaining concepts. It is suggested that the words used in the concept definition should be selected carefully by the teachers to teach the concepts correctly and the teachers use hand signs for concepts in their lesson.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gürefe, N. (2022). How Must a Polygon Be According to Hard of Hearing Students? An Investigation with a Semiotic Approach. REDIMAT, 11(2), 180–213. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.6097

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free