Human studies on probiotics: Aspects of scientific documentation

47Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The assessment of probiotic health effects has to be based on human studies. Knowledge of the mechanisms is an important factor, complemented with target functions and biomarkers that are accepted as relevant to the state of health and well-being or reduction in risk of disease. Human studies should preferably be conducted by at least two independent research groups in different locations. In conclusion, well-designed human studies with requirements similar to those for pharmaceutical studies are required to demonstrate health benefits. Additionally, epidemiological studies or post-marketing surveillance can be recommended to assess both safety and efficacy of probiotics. Using these criteria, only a few health-promoting effects can be considered scientifically proven for specific strains. These include effects upon rotavirus diarrhoea, antibiotitic-associated diarrhoea and alleviation of lactose intolerance symptoms. The reported effects are strain-specific and product-specific. As more information is accumulating the evidence may be soon obtained for other health effects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salminen, S. (2001). Human studies on probiotics: Aspects of scientific documentation. Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition/Naringsforskning. https://doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v45i0.1783

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free