Incentivizing innovation: Adding to the tool kit

58Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Intellectual property rights (IPR) create incentives for research but impose static efficiency losses and other costs. In this essay, we discuss recent proposals of other mechanisms for rewarding innovation and argue that incremental experimentation with mechanisms that supplement rather than replace IPR can help to test and refine these mechanisms without undermining existing institutions. Prizes, such as those recently offered by the X-Prize Foundation, have been successful in spurring research but have typically targeted demonstration projects rather than innovations capable of being used at scale. To spur the creation of products for widespread use, the design of prizes could be usefully extended by conditioning rewards on a market test, as in the recent $1.5 billion pilot Advance Market Commitment (AMC) for a pneumococcus vaccine. Copyright © 2010 by the National Bureau of Economic Research. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kremer, M., & Williams, H. (2009). Incentivizing innovation: Adding to the tool kit. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 10, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1086/605851

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free