Abstract
The schedule delays on construction project is one of the case that inflict a financial loss towards stakeholders. Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) is a scheduling methode that can be alternative solution from schedule controlling. This methode is done by reducing the multitasking, student syndrom, parkinson’s law and giving the buffer in the end of time project. The aim of this study is comparing CCPM methode to Critical Path Methode (CPM) methode on Menara Rungkut apartment construction, Surabaya. CPM its self is the traditional project schedule that still use alternative time on each activity to protect the activities. The initial project schedule employ the traditional schedule methode by gantt chart that is then divided into detail and comprehensive by the relation among their activites in CPM form. Futhermore, it will be compared to CPPM schedule result that have reduced multitasking, safetytime on each activity and have given buffer on their work. Compared to the times, this study elucidate time duration for CCPM is 121 days that 48 days prior to CPM methode.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Aulady, M. F. N., & Orleans, C. (2016). Perbandingan Durasi Waktu Proyek Konstruksi AntaraMetode CriticalPathMethod (CPM) dengan Metode Critical Chain Project Management (Studi Kasus: Proyek Pembangunan Apartamen Menara Rungkut). Jurnal IPTEK, 20(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.31284/j.iptek.2016.v20i1.29
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.