Who’s on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services

38Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In recent years, third-party genetic interpretation services have emerged to help individuals understand their raw genetic data obtained from researchers, clinicians, and direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies. The objectives of these services vary but include matching users to genetic relatives, selling customized diet and fitness plans, and providing health risk assessments. As these services proliferate, concerns are being raised about their accuracy, safety, and privacy practices. Thus far, US regulatory agencies have not taken an official position with respect to third-party genetic interpretation services, which has caused uncertainty regarding whether and how they might be regulated. To clarify this area, we analyzed their potential oversight by four US agencies that generally have been active in the regulation of genetic testing services and information: the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Civil Rights, and the Federal Trade Commission. We conclude that the scope of federal jurisdiction over third-party genetic interpretation services—while limited—could be appropriate at this time, subject to agency clarification and appropriate exercise of oversight.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guerrini, C. J., Wagner, J. K., Nelson, S. C., Javitt, G. H., & McGuire, A. L. (2020, January 1). Who’s on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services. Genetics in Medicine. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0627-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free