HER2 status of bone marrow micrometastasis and their corresponding primary tumours in a pilot study of 27 cases: A possible tool for anti-HER2 therapy management?

52Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Discrepancies have been reported between HER2 status in primary breast cancer and micrometastatic cells in bone marrow. The aim of this study was to assess HER2 gene status in micrometastatic cells in bone marrow and corresponding primary tumour. Micrometastatic cells were detected in bone marrow aspirations in a prospective series of 27 breast cancer patients by immunocytochemistry (pancytokeratin antibody). HER2 status of micrometastatic cells was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), respectively in 24 out of 27. Primary tumour HER2 status was assessed by immunohistochemistry (CB11 antibody) and by FISH in 20 out of 27 of the cases. HER2 was amplified or overexpressed in five out of 27 (18.5%) primary tumours and in four out of 27 (15%) micrometastatic cells. In two cases, HER2 was overexpressed and amplified in primary tumour, but not in micrometastatic cells, whereas, in one case, HER2 presented a low amplification rate (six copies) in micrometastatic cells not found in the primary tumour. We demonstrated that negative and positive HER2 status remained, in the majority of the cases, stable between the bone marrow micrometastasis and the primary tumour. Therefore, the efficiency of anti-HER2 adjuvant therapy could be evaluated, in a clinical trial, by sequential detection of HER2-positive micrometastatic cells within the bone marrow, before and after treatment. © 2007 Cancer Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vincent-Salomon, A., Pierga, J. Y., Couturier, J., D’Enghien, C. D., Nos, C., Sigal-Zafrani, B., … Sastre-Garau, X. (2007). HER2 status of bone marrow micrometastasis and their corresponding primary tumours in a pilot study of 27 cases: A possible tool for anti-HER2 therapy management? British Journal of Cancer, 96(4), 654–659. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603584

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free