Endoscopic retrieval vs observation in cylindrical battery ingestion

8Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Battery ingestion, particularly in the pediatric population, has become more common since the development of button batteries. Consequently, formal recommendations regarding the management of this battery type have been developed. Larger cylindrical battery ingestion is less common, with fewer cases reported. As such, no clear practice guidelines have been developed for the management of cylindrical battery ingestion. Case Report: We present a case of an incarcerated adult who ingested 2 AA batteries. One battery was retrieved endoscopically, but the second passed into the distal small bowel beyond endoscopicmeans of retrieval. The second battery passed spontaneously via the rectum after administration of laxatives and supportive care. Conclusion: Our case and review of the literature demonstrate that nonsurgical, conservative management with close clinical monitoring is possible in a hospital setting after cylindrical battery ingestion. Caseswith concerning clinical symptoms or a historyof damage to the battery casing warrant endoscopic or surgical intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hammami, M. B., Alkaade, S., Taylor, J. R., & Piraka, C. (2019). Endoscopic retrieval vs observation in cylindrical battery ingestion. Ochsner Journal, 19(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.18.0020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free