A physics-informed hybrid ML framework for pore pressure and fracture gradient prediction in carbonate reservoirs

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of formation pore pressure and fracture gradient is essential for safe mud-weight selection and wellbore stability, especially in heterogeneous offshore carbonate reservoirs. Classical empirical methods (Eaton, Miller, and Zhang) often degrade in such settings, while purely data-driven models can be hard to justify when calibration data are sparse. This study presents a physics-informed hybrid framework that integrates classical model outputs with a new Adaptive Calibration Layer (ACL) and an uncertainty quantification module (UQM) within a gradient-boosted learning architecture. The ACL learns depth-dependent corrections from sparse MDT/XPT points while enforcing physical smoothness. The framework was evaluated on six wells from an Iranian offshore carbonate gas field. After calibration, classical models achieved R2 = 0.85–0.90 with RMSE = 0.7–1.1 MPa, whereas the hybrid model improved cross-well performance to R2 = 0.94, RMSE = 0.45 MPa, and MAE = 0.32 MPa (about 60% error reduction). The UQM reports depth-wise 95% confidence bounds, typically within ± 0.4 MPa, enabling risk-aware mud-weight planning. Overall, the method narrows uncertainty in the operational drilling window and improves pressure and fracture-gradient prediction in carbonate drilling.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tahvildari, S. P., Shojaei, S., & Masihi, M. (2026). A physics-informed hybrid ML framework for pore pressure and fracture gradient prediction in carbonate reservoirs. Scientific Reports, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41773-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free