The reconciliation of multiple conflicting estimates: Entropy-based and axiomatic approaches

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When working with economic accounts it may occur that multiple estimates of a single datum exist, with different degrees of uncertainty or data quality. This paper addresses the problem of defining a method that can reconcile conflicting estimates, given best guess and uncertainty values. We proceeded from first principles, using two different routes. First, under an entropy-based approach, the data reconciliation problem is addressed as a particular case of a wider data balancing problem, and an alternative setting is found in which the multiple estimates are replaced by a single one. Afterwards, under an axiomatic approach, a set of properties is defined, which characterizes the ideal data reconciliation method. Under both approaches, the conclusion is that the formula for the reconciliation of best guesses is a weighted arithmetic average, with the inverse of uncertainties as weights, and that the formula for the reconciliation of uncertainties is a harmonic average.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodrigues, J. F. D., & Lahr, M. L. (2018). The reconciliation of multiple conflicting estimates: Entropy-based and axiomatic approaches. Entropy, 20(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/e20110815

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free