Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials

41Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite. Methodology: Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials were placed on the dentine surface and were aged in deionized water for 14 days. The 3-D surface roughness was evaluated before and after chewing simulation cycles (50,000). The samples were fatigued mechanically using a chewing simulator and investigated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: For shear bond strength, alkasite showed significantly high values than GIC, whereas non-significant difference was observed between alkasite and nano-hybrid composite. After the chewing simulation (50,000 cycles), non-significant difference was found between GIC and nano-hybrid composite, where surface roughness values were highest for GIC and lowest for alkasite. Conclusion: The newly developed restorative material (alkasite) has shown better results than existing restorative materials.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naz, F., Samad Khan, A., Kader, M. A., Al Gelban, L. O. S., Mousa, N. M. A., Asiri, R. S. H., & Hakeem, A. S. (2021). Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials. Saudi Dental Journal, 33(7), 666–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free