Trueness and Internal Fit of 3D Printed Provisional Veneers: An In Vitro Comparative Study

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Dentistry is steadily evolving along the digital pathway at a constant and sure pace. Intraoral scanners (IOSs) started to enhance the precision and trueness of the restorations, making prosthodontics treatment more predictable. The objective of this study was to compare the trueness and internal fit of the printed provisional veneers for 60 preparations with three different types of finish lines. The abutments were scanned with the same intraoral scanner, and the resulting meshes were overlapped and analyzed in metrology software. The comparison was executed using two methods: (1) CAD (computer-aided design) designs vs. scanned veneers and (2) inverted surfaces of the preparations vs. scanned veneers. The butt joint preparation had the best trueness out of the three groups of preparation during both comparison methods, although there was no statistically significant difference between the butt joint and feather edge groups in the CAD design vs. scanned veneers analysis. Also, there was no statistically significant difference between palatal chamfer and feather edge groups in the scanned veneers vs. inverted surfaces of the preparations analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anghel-Lorinți, A. E., Faur, A. B., Rotar, R. N., & Jivănescu, A. (2024). Trueness and Internal Fit of 3D Printed Provisional Veneers: An In Vitro Comparative Study. Bioengineering, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11121204

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free