Low-dose aspirin and risk of upper/lower gastrointestinal bleeding by bleed severity: a cohort study with nested case-control analysis using primary care electronic health records from the United Kingdom

15Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Risks of low-dose aspirin-associated upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeds (UGIB/LGIB) may vary by severity and presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). No study has quantified these risks for UGIB and LGIB in the same real-world study population. Patients and methods: Using UK primary care data, 199,049 new users of low-dose aspirin (75–300 mg/day) and 1:1 matched non-users were followed to identify incident UGIB (N = 1843)/LGIB (N = 2763) cases. Nested case-control analyses compared current low-dose aspirin vs. non-use on UGIB/LGIB risk. Results: Adjusted incidence rate ratios (ORs; 95% CIs) were 1.62 (1.42–1.86) for non-fatal UGIB, 1.63 (1.47–1.81) for non-fatal LGIB, 0.77 (0.51–1.16) for fatal UGIB, 1.29 (0.50–3.36) for fatal LGIB. For hospitalizations, adjusted ORs (95% CIs) were 1.55 (1.32–1.81) for UGIB and 1.89 (1.58–2.27) for LGIB; for referred only cases, they were 1.52 (1.26–1.84) for UGIB and 1.54 (1.37–1.73) for LGIB. In primary CVD prevention, adjusted ORs (95% CI) were 1.62 (1.38–1.90) for UGIB and 1.60 (1.42–1.81) for LGIB; in secondary CVD prevention, they were 1.16 (0.89–1.50) for UGIB and 1.67 (1.34–2.09) for LGIB. Conclusion: Low-dose aspirin was associated with increased risks of non-fatal but not fatal UGIB/LGIB.Key message Low-dose aspirin is associated with an increased risks of non-fatal UGIB/LGIB but not fatal UGIB/LGIB.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

García Rodríguez, L. A., Lanas, A., Soriano-Gabarró, M., & Cea Soriano, L. (2019). Low-dose aspirin and risk of upper/lower gastrointestinal bleeding by bleed severity: a cohort study with nested case-control analysis using primary care electronic health records from the United Kingdom. Annals of Medicine, 51(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2019.1591635

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free