Institutional Practice and Social Norms: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Family Protection Trajectories in the United Arab Emirates (2019–2025)

Abstract

Despite legislative advancements, social and reputational norms continue to govern domestic conflict’s institutional visibility. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design in the United Arab Emirates, covering the period 2019–2025, this study analyzes how the transition across two successive domestic violence statutes is associated with women’s institutional trajectories. Quantitatively, 412 first-instance case files were analyzed using non-parametric tests and a CHAID decision tree. Qualitatively, interviews with women (n = 28) and institutional actors (n = 23) explain how “status flipping” occurs through counter-complaints and moral character narratives. Findings indicate that norms-based moral regulation and structural constraints (e.g., financial dependency and custody leverage) are strong correlates of escalation from case closure to formal prosecution. The CHAID model identifies structural constraints as the principal splitter in trajectory separation. Post-2024 patterns suggest an institutional lag, where implementation routines evolve more slowly than formal law. The paper contributes a model of reputation-mediated escalation and proposes procedural safeguarding to curb retaliatory cross-filing and make patterned coercive control legally legible. By situating women’s legal interactions within an interactional pathway of norms, constraints, and institutional translation, the study clarifies why “protection” can paradoxically morph into complex procedural outcomes in legally transitioning contexts.