Postoperative Deep Surgical-Site Infection after Instrumented Spinal Surgery: A Multicenter Study

  • Ishii M
  • Iwasaki M
  • Ohwada T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A retrospective survey revealed 37 cases (1.1%) of deep surgical-site infection (SSI) among 3,462 instrumented spinal surgeries between 2004 and 2008. Excluding 8 patients who were unclassifiable, we categorized 29 patients into 3 groups of similar backgrounds—thoracolumbar degenerative disease (the DEG group; n = 15), osteoporotic vertebral collapse (the OVC group; n = 10), and cervical disorders (the cervical group; n = 4)—and investigated the key to implant salvage. Final respective implant retention rates for the groups were 40, 0, and 100%, with the OVC group having the worst rate (p < 0.01). In the DEG group with early infection, those whose implants were retained had lower body temperatures, lower white blood cell counts, and a lower rate of discharge at the time of SSI diagnosis (p < 0.05). Implant retention may be affected by initial spinal pathology. In the DEG group, debridement before drainage may be advantageous to implant salvage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ishii, M., Iwasaki, M., Ohwada, T., Oda, T., Matsuoka, T., Tamura, Y., & Izawa, K. (2013). Postoperative Deep Surgical-Site Infection after Instrumented Spinal Surgery: A Multicenter Study. Global Spine Journal, 3(2), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1343072

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free