What Matters to Kansas: Small Business and the Defeat of the Kansas Tax Experiment

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Why would businesses advocate for a tax increase? They may take such a position, this article argues, when tax cuts threaten their long-term economic interests. In 2012, Kansas eliminated taxes on many business owners but destabilized the economy and exposed small business to the harshness of market forces. Small businesses rely more on state services than large businesses and are more situated in local communities. The literature suggests two main reasons for small businesses’ “enlightened self-interest” perspective. First, many benefited only marginally from the tax cuts. Second, the savings were offset by fiscal damage to state services that small businesses rely on. They advocated for higher taxes on themselves neither out of altruism nor entirely out of self-interest but recognizing that they had to pay taxes in order to stabilize the economic environment. In that position, small businesses in Kansas may occupy the moderating political role once occupied by a now-fractured corporate elite.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alvord, D. R. (2020). What Matters to Kansas: Small Business and the Defeat of the Kansas Tax Experiment. Politics and Society, 48(1), 27–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329219894788

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free