A comparative investigation of prevalent hydrodynamic modelling approaches for floating offshore wind turbine foundations: A tetraspar case study

13Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Numerical models have been used extensively in the design process of the TetraSpar floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) foundation to optimize and investigate the influence from a number of structural and environmental conditions. In traditional offshore design, either the Morison approach or a linear boundary element method (BEM) is applied to investigate the hydrodynamic loads on a structure. The present study investigated and compared these two methods and evaluated their applicability on the TetraSpar FOWT concept. Furthermore, a hybrid model containing load contributions from both approaches was evaluated. This study focuses on motion response. In the evaluation, hydrodynamic data from BEM codes are applied, while the commercial software package OrcaFlex is utilized for time series simulations of the coupled structure. The investigation highlights the difference between the modelling approaches and the importance of particularly drag and inertia contributions. By optimizing the input coefficients, reasonable agreement between the models can be achieved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomsen, J. B., Têtu, A., & Stiesdal, H. (2021). A comparative investigation of prevalent hydrodynamic modelling approaches for floating offshore wind turbine foundations: A tetraspar case study. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9070683

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free